Mechanisms of hepatotoxicity associated with the monocyclic ß-lactam antibiotic BAL30072.

BAL30072 is a new monocyclic ß-lactam antibiotic under development which provides a therapeutic option for the treatment of severe infections caused by multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Despite the absence of liver toxicity in preclinical studies in rats and marmosets and in single dose clinical studies in humans, increased transaminase activities were observed in healthy subjects in multiple-dose clinical studies. We, therefore, initiated a comprehensive program to find out the mechanisms leading to hepatocellular injury using HepG2 cells (human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line), HepaRG cells (inducible hepatocytes derived from a human hepatic progenitor cell line), and human liver microtissue preparations. Our investigations demonstrated a concentration- and time-dependent reduction of the ATP content of BAL30072-treated HepG2 cells and liver microtissues. BAL30072 impaired oxygen consumption by HepG2 cells at clinically relevant concentrations, inhibited complexes II and III of the mitochondrial electron transport chain, increased the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and reduced the mitochondrial membrane potential. Furthermore, BAL 30072 impaired mitochondrial fatty acid metabolism, inhibited glycolysis, and was associated with hepatocyte apoptosis. Co-administration of N-acetyl-L-cysteine partially protected hepatocytes from BAL30072-mediated toxicity, underscoring the role of oxidative damage in the observed hepatocellular toxicity. In conclusion, BAL30072 is toxic for liver mitochondria and inhibits glycolysis at clinically relevant concentrations. Impaired hepatic mitochondrial function and inhibition of glycolysis can explain liver injury observed in human subjects receiving long-term treatment with this compound.

Discovery of Novel Pyridone-Conjugated Monosulfactams as Potent and Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics for Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections.

Conjugating a siderophore to an antibiotic is a promising strategy to overcome the permeability-mediated resistance of Gram-negative pathogens. On the basis of the structure of BAL30072, novel pyridone-conjugated monosulfactams incorporating diverse substituents into the methylene linker between the 1,3-dihydroxypyridin-4(1H)-one and the aminothiazole oxime were designed and synthesized. Structure-activity relationship studies revealed that a variety of substituents were tolerated, with isopropyl (compound 12c) and methylthiomethyl (compound 16a) showing the best efficacy against multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative pathogens. In addition, compound 12c exhibits a good free fraction rate in an in vitro human plasma protein binding test, along with a low clearance and favorable plasma exposure in vivo. In a murine systemic infection model with MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae, compound 12c shows an ED50 of 10.20 mg/kg. Taken together, the results indicate that compound 12c is a promising drug candidate for the treatment of serious infections caused by MDR Gram-negative pathogens.

A pharmacokinetic evaluation of concomitant administration of linezolid and aztreonam.

Linezolid, a new oxazolidinone antimicrobial agent, has a spectrum of activity encompassing a wide variety of Grampositive bacteria. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of linezolid and aztreonam, an antimicrobial agent with selective activity against Gram-negative bacteria, when given alone and in combination. Healthy subjects were randomized to receive single, 30-minute intravenous infusions of (1) linezolid 375 mg, (2) aztreonam 1000 mg, and (3) linezolid 375 mg plus aztreonam 1000 mg in an open-label, crossover manner. The only statistically significant differences observed with combination treatment relative to each drug alone were an increase in the maximum plasma concentration of linezolid (approximately 18%) and an approximate 7% decrease in the apparent elimination rate of aztreonam, neither of which are expected to be clinically significant. In healthy subjects, the combination of linezolid and aztreonam was safe and well tolerated compared with each agent used alone. Pharmacokinetic data demonstrate that coadministration of linezolid and aztreonam does not alter the disposition of either agent under single-dose conditions. Therefore, it is not expected that a dose alteration of either agent will be necessary in a clinical setting.

Comparison of the effects of aztreonam and tigemonam against Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in vitro and in vivo.

A study was performed to investigate the pharmacodynamics of aztreonam and tigemonam against Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in vitro and in vivo. The in vitro concentration-effect relationships were determined in short-term growth experiments. The in vivo dose-effect relationships were determined in an experimental thigh muscle infection in irradiated mice. In this model, E. coli was injected into one thigh muscle and K. pneumoniae was injected into the other. Throughout these experiments aztreonam was administered subcutaneously and tigemonam was administered orally. For analysis of the antibacterial pharmacodynamics, the following parameters were determined: the maximum effect as a parameter for efficacy, the 50% effective concentration (or dose) as a parameter for potency, and the slope of the concentration-effect relationship. To assess the relationship between the concentration of the antibiotic and the antibacterial effect in vivo, the pharmacokinetics of the two drugs in the plasma of mice were determined as well. The maximum in vitro and in vivo effects of aztreonam and tigemonam against both bacteria did not differ substantially. However, both drugs killed E. coli more effectively than K. pneumoniae, indicating that the maximum in vitro effect of these drugs against E. coli was higher than that against K. pneumoniae. The maximum in vivo effect of both drugs against E. coli was similar to that against K. pneumoniae. Furthermore, in vitro aztreonam was about twice as potent as tigemonam, but in vivo the reverse was the case. These findings were explained by pharmacokinetic differences between subcutaneously administered aztreonam and orally administered tigemonam, because concentrations of tigemonam in plasma remained at microbiologically active concentrations longer than those of aztreonam did.